Ankle Elbow Finger Hip Knee Not applicable Shoulder Wrist

Ankle arthroplasy Elbow arthroplasty Finger arthroplasty Hip arthroplasty Hip hemiarthroplasty Hip revision arthroplasty Knee arthroplasty Knee revision arthroplasty Not applicable Patellofemoral knee arthroplasty Radial head elbow arthroplasty Radiocapitellar elbow arthroplasty Resurfacing hip arthroplasty Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty Shoulder arthroplasty Shoulder hemiarthroplasty Total anatomical shoulder arthroplasty Total ankle arthroplasty Total elbow arthroplasty Total hip arthroplasty Total knee arthroplasty Total Shoulder arthroplasty Unicondylar knee arthroplasty Wrist arthroplasty

Age Age: <18 years Age: elderly Age: young Antibiotic loaded bone cement Antibiotic prophylaxis Antibiotics policy Anticoagulant use Arthrofibrosis Arthroplasty register Articulation Articulation: ceramic-on-ceramic Articulation: metal-on-metal ASA classification Bearing type Benefits Benzodiazepine use Best worst scaling experiment Bilaterality Bioactive coating Bipolar head BMI Bone-implant surface Competing risk model Completeness Constrained acetabular liners Conversion to TKA Costs COVID-19 Cryo- and compression therapy CUSUMs DAIR Database comparison Database linkage Delphi study Depression Diagnosis Diagnosis: fracture Diagnosis: late posttraumatic Diagnosis: osteoarthritis Diagnosis: Perthes and dysplasia Disability pension Dual mobility cups Femoral head size Femoral stem design Femoral stem design: short-stemmed Femoral stem design: size Femoral stem length Femoral stem size Femoral stem size: 13 Fixation Friday the 13th Glenohumeral radial mismatch Glenoid component type Hospital variation Hospital volume Humeral stem design Humeral stem design: modularity Implant choice Implant classification Intra operative fluoroscopy Learning curve Machine learning Manufacturer Manufacturer: availability Manufacturer: mixed Megaprosthesis reconstruction Mental, social and pathophysiological factors Methodology Microbiology Microplasty instrumentation Migration of cups Minimal Important Difference Multiple joint arthroplasties Nested RCT New prosthesis design New technology NOV advise NOV classification onlay vs inlay shoulder system Opioid use Osteonecrosis Osteosynthesis Osteotomy Outcome information Outlier procedure Oxford Hip Score Oxford Knee Score Pain Patellar resurfacing Patellofemoral knee arthroplasty Patient characteristics Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) Periprothetic fracture Preoperative PROM-scores Previous surgery Procedure characteristics PROMIS PROMIS: CAT PROMs PROMs: preoperative scores Prosthesis characteristics Quality of care Reason for revision Registry description Regression discontinuity methods Revision Revision components RSA tested Safety notices Shoulder arthroplasty Smoking Socioeconomic status Stability Stability: posterior stabilized vs. cruciate retaining Surgical approach Surgical approach: anterior approach Surgical approach: direct anterior approach Surgical approach: direct superior approach Surgical case volume Surgical instrument sets Target trial emulation Trends Type of hospital Type of prosthesis Unicondylar side Validation

Carbon footprint Complications Conversion to total hip arthroplasty Cup revision Data quality Definition of poor response Descriptive Feasibility Immortal time bias Implant choice Implant library Infection International comparison ISAR PROMs Mortality Overview Prediction model Prevalence PROMs PROMs: minimal important difference PROMs: response Quality of care Quality of life (EQ-5D) Re-revision Re-revision for dislocation Reasons for revision Recovery trajectories Rerevision revision Revision Revision for aseptic loosening Revision for dislocation Revision for infection Revision for malalignment Revision: cup Revision: glenoid Stem revision Trend Trends Validation

Bloemheuvel, E Bohm, ER Bolder, S Bongers, J Boonen, B Bos, PK Boymans, T Braaksma, C Brouwer, RW Buijze, GA Callary, S de Steiger, RN de Witte, PB Denissen, GAW Doornberg, JN Eygendaal, D Farey, J Fiocco, M Furnes, O Gademan, MGJ Goosen, J Gosens, T Groenwold, R Hannink, G Haverkamp, D Heijnens, L Hermus, J Hosman, A Huitema, G Huizinga, M Huizinga, MR Inglesrud, L Janssen, R Jelsma, J Kerkhoffs, GMMJ Keuter, X Koëter, S Kooistra, BW Lambers Heerspink, O Lingsma, HF Lübbeke, A Marang-van de Mheen, PJ Moerman, S Morrenhof, JW Most, J Nagels, J Nelissen, RGHH Nolte, P Pijls, BG Poolman, RW Prkic, A Quispel, C Reijman, M Rietbergen, L Rolfson, O Rutger, M Schotanus, M Schreurs, W Smulders, K Spekenbrink, A Swierstra, BA ten Broeke, R Vakalopoulos, K.A. van den Bekerom, MPJ van der Linde, JA van der Pas, S van der Wal, B van der Wal, RJP van der Weegen, W van Egmond, J van Egmond, PW van Geenen, R van Jonbergen, HPW van Noort, A van Oldenrijk, J van Raaij, TM van Rensch, PJH van Steenbergen, LN van Susante, J Veen EJ Veen, EJ Vehmeijer, S Verhaar, JAN Wolterbeek, N Zijlstra, WP Zuiderbaan, HA

Approved Ongoing Published